Review



primary antibody against anti gr  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)


Bioz Verified Symbol Santa Cruz Biotechnology is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 96
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Santa Cruz Biotechnology primary antibody against anti gr
    Primary Antibody Against Anti Gr, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 888 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/primary antibody against anti gr/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 96 stars, based on 888 article reviews
    primary antibody against anti gr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    primary antibodies against gr  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)
    90
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc primary antibodies against gr
    Primary Antibodies Against Gr, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/primary antibodies against gr/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary antibodies against gr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    primary antibody against anti gr  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
    96
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology primary antibody against anti gr
    Primary Antibody Against Anti Gr, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/primary antibody against anti gr/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary antibody against anti gr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    primary antibodies against gr (h-300) and phospho-gr (pgr)  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
    90
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology primary antibodies against gr (h-300) and phospho-gr (pgr)
    Primary Antibodies Against Gr (H 300) And Phospho Gr (Pgr), supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/primary antibodies against gr (h-300) and phospho-gr (pgr)/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary antibodies against gr (h-300) and phospho-gr (pgr) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    primary antibodies against gr (h-300  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
    90
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology primary antibodies against gr (h-300
    Primary Antibodies Against Gr (H 300, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/primary antibodies against gr (h-300/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary antibodies against gr (h-300 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    primary antibodies against gr‐1  (Becton Dickinson)
    90
    Becton Dickinson primary antibodies against gr‐1
    The cytotoxicity test of candidate peptides. a) Comparison of cytotoxicity of each nano‐vector by MTT assay ( n = 3, data are presented as means ± SDs, and the significant differences were analyzed by one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01). b) Morphological changes in the cells treated with various vectors; Scale bars: 25 µm. c–f) C57BL/6 mice were injected with various cationic peptides ( n = 3). Hematoxylin‐eosin (HE) staining (c), TUNEL staining (d), and immunofluorescence staining of MPO+ (e) and <t>Gr‐1</t> + cells (f) in representative mouse lung sections 24 h after injection are presented. g) Histogram of (c–f). ( n = 3, data are presented as means ± SDs, and the significant differences were analyzed by two‐tailed unpaired t‐test. ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001). h) Comparison of the characteristics of predicted peptides. The number of dots represents the score.
    Primary Antibodies Against Gr‐1, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/primary antibodies against gr‐1/product/Becton Dickinson
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary antibodies against gr‐1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    primary antibodies against mif, gr, nlrp3, cd74, and asc  (Novus Biologicals)
    90
    Novus Biologicals primary antibodies against mif, gr, nlrp3, cd74, and asc
    The cytotoxicity test of candidate peptides. a) Comparison of cytotoxicity of each nano‐vector by MTT assay ( n = 3, data are presented as means ± SDs, and the significant differences were analyzed by one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01). b) Morphological changes in the cells treated with various vectors; Scale bars: 25 µm. c–f) C57BL/6 mice were injected with various cationic peptides ( n = 3). Hematoxylin‐eosin (HE) staining (c), TUNEL staining (d), and immunofluorescence staining of MPO+ (e) and <t>Gr‐1</t> + cells (f) in representative mouse lung sections 24 h after injection are presented. g) Histogram of (c–f). ( n = 3, data are presented as means ± SDs, and the significant differences were analyzed by two‐tailed unpaired t‐test. ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001). h) Comparison of the characteristics of predicted peptides. The number of dots represents the score.
    Primary Antibodies Against Mif, Gr, Nlrp3, Cd74, And Asc, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/primary antibodies against mif, gr, nlrp3, cd74, and asc/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary antibodies against mif, gr, nlrp3, cd74, and asc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    The cytotoxicity test of candidate peptides. a) Comparison of cytotoxicity of each nano‐vector by MTT assay ( n = 3, data are presented as means ± SDs, and the significant differences were analyzed by one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01). b) Morphological changes in the cells treated with various vectors; Scale bars: 25 µm. c–f) C57BL/6 mice were injected with various cationic peptides ( n = 3). Hematoxylin‐eosin (HE) staining (c), TUNEL staining (d), and immunofluorescence staining of MPO+ (e) and Gr‐1 + cells (f) in representative mouse lung sections 24 h after injection are presented. g) Histogram of (c–f). ( n = 3, data are presented as means ± SDs, and the significant differences were analyzed by two‐tailed unpaired t‐test. ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001). h) Comparison of the characteristics of predicted peptides. The number of dots represents the score.

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: Identification of Potent siRNA Delivery Peptides Using Computer Modeling

    doi: 10.1002/advs.202308345

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The cytotoxicity test of candidate peptides. a) Comparison of cytotoxicity of each nano‐vector by MTT assay ( n = 3, data are presented as means ± SDs, and the significant differences were analyzed by one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01). b) Morphological changes in the cells treated with various vectors; Scale bars: 25 µm. c–f) C57BL/6 mice were injected with various cationic peptides ( n = 3). Hematoxylin‐eosin (HE) staining (c), TUNEL staining (d), and immunofluorescence staining of MPO+ (e) and Gr‐1 + cells (f) in representative mouse lung sections 24 h after injection are presented. g) Histogram of (c–f). ( n = 3, data are presented as means ± SDs, and the significant differences were analyzed by two‐tailed unpaired t‐test. ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001). h) Comparison of the characteristics of predicted peptides. The number of dots represents the score.

    Article Snippet: The slides were immersed with primary antibodies against Gr‐1 (BD Biosciences, 1:50), MPO (Proteintech, 1:50), KI67 (Abcam, 1:50), F4/80 (CST, 1:50), and CD206 (CST, 1:50) at 4°C pass the night and then incubated 1 h with secondary antibodies at RT.

    Techniques: Comparison, Plasmid Preparation, MTT Assay, Injection, Staining, TUNEL Assay, Immunofluorescence, Two Tailed Test